- The Government securities market saw a strengthening of the primary dealer system. The
excess demand for investment funds moderated, and the liquidity conditions eased in early 1996-97. The
yield to maturity on auctioned 91-day treasury bills fell steadily to 6.92 per cent in November 1996 from
the high of 12.97 per cent at the beginning of the year. The fall in the yield on 364-day treasury bills
was relatively less pronounced, but it also fell to 10.33 per cent by end-December, 1996 from 13.12 per
cent in end-March, 1996. The coupon rate on 10 year GOI bonds fell only marginally to 13.85 per cent
in 1996-97 from 14 per cent in 1995-96. This significant softening in the cut-off yields along with the
decline in the call rates indicated an easing of demand-supply gaps in the money and credit market conditions.
- The eligibility criteria for issuers were strengthened in 1996-97. At the same time, SEBI took
several measures to provide issuers with more flexibility in the issue process. As part of this effort,
stringent and detailed disclosure norms were prescribed, greater transparency in the draft prospectus required,
and separate criteria for finance companies prescribed.
- Criteria for accessing the securities markets were strengthened. Issuers proposing to make the
first offer to the public of equity, or any security convertible at a later date into equity, are now required
to have a track record of dividend payment in three of the immediately preceding five years. Issuers
not meeting this requirement can get their securities listed, provided their project is appraised by a
financial institution or scheduled commercial bank, and the appraising institution contributes at least 10 per
cent of the project cost. This requirement was also imposed in the case of issues by listed companies
where the post-issue equity capital exceeds five times the equity capital prior to the issue.
- In view of the circumstances in which public sector banks operated in the past, they have
been permitted to comply with less stringent criteria. The entry criteria required for other issuers would
not apply to public sector banks. Further, public sector banks have been allowed to price issues at a
premium provided they have a two year profitability record, as against the three year requirement for other issuers.
- SEBI announced several measures aimed at providing greater flexibility to the issuers. Offer
documents would no longer be vetted by the SEBI. Merchant bankers and issuers would remain responsible
for ensuring compliance with the norms on disclosure and investment protection prescribed by the SEBI.
A number of steps were taken to encourage the development of a debt market. Debt issues not
accompanied by an equity component, can be sold entirely by the book-building process, subject to Section 19 (2)
(b) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules. The requirement of 90 per cent minimum
subscription in case of offers for sale has been done away with for exclusive debt issues, subject to certain
disclosures and exemptions under the Companies Act. Issuers have been allowed to list debt securities on
stock exchanges, even if their equity is not listed. Book-building has been allowed for equity issues of less
than Rs.100 crore, subject to compliance with the SC(R) Rules. For all companies in whose issue
the promoters' contribution exceeds Rs.100 crore, promoters have been allowed to bring in their
contribution in a phased manner, irrespective of their track record. Corporate advertisements between the date
of issue of acknowledgement card and the date of closure of the issue, have been allowed, subject
to specific conditions which include the disclosure of risk factors. To ensure that public issues were
widely subscribed to and held new norms of shareholding were
prescribed. (Box 4.1).
BOX 4.1
Primary Market Reforms: 1996-97
|
- Norms for companies to access the capital market further tightened to improve the quality of paper.
- First time issuers required to have a dividend payment record in three of the immediately preceding five years.
- For issuers who do not meet this requirement, access to markets allowed, provided their projects were appraised by a scheduled commercial bank or a public financial institution with minimum 10 per cent participation in the equity capital of the issuer or, provided their securities are listed on the OTCEI.
- No entry restrictions for public sector banks to access market, and they have been allowed to price issues at a premium, with only a two year profitability record.
- A norm of 5 shareholders for every Rs.1 lakh of fresh issue of capital and 10 shareholders for every Rs.1 lakh of offer for sale prescribed as an initial and continuing listing requirement.
- Prohibition was imposed on payment of any direct or indirect discounts or commissions to persons receiving firm allotment.
- SEBI gave up vetting of public issue offer documents. SEBI's comments on offer document, if any, will be communicated within 21 days of filing, as is the case with rights issues.
- Debt issues not accompanied by an equity component permitted to be sold entirely by the book building process subject to Section 19(2) (b) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules.
- If minimum shareholding requirements are met, the requirement of 90 per cent minimum subscription in case of, ''offers for sale'' no longer necessary.
- The 90 per cent requirement also done away with in case of exclusive debt issue subject to certain disclosures and exemptions under the Companies Act.
- Housing Finance Companies considered to be registered for issue purposes provided they were eligible for refinance from the National Housing Bank.
- Corporate advertisements, between the date of issue of acknowledgement card and the date of closure of the issue have been allowed, subject to specific conditions which include the disclosure of risk factors.
- Promoters with contribution exceeding Rs. 100 crore have been allowed to bring in their contribution in a phased manner, irrespective of their track record.
- Issuers have been allowed to list debt securities on stock exchanges without their equity being listed.
|
- The downtrend in primary markets seen in 1995-96 continued in 1996-97. Capital raised through new
issues during April-December 1996 was down to Rs.10,369.21 crore from Rs.14,151.1 crore during
April-December 1995. Over the same months, the number of issues fell correspondingly from 1,132 in
1995 to 793 in 1996, but the average size of the issue rose marginally from Rs. 12.50 crore to Rs.13.07 crore.
The mix of public and rights issues also changed, with the proportion of the former rising to 83 per
cent of the total. Public issues fell by only 11 per cent from Rs.9,694.48 to Rs.8,619.37 crore. The
average size of public issues rose from Rs.10.50 crore to Rs.12.66 crore. Rights issues, on the other hand,
fell to Rs.1,749.84 crore, less than 40 per cent of the amount raised in April-December 1995 (Table
4.1)
. Their average size also declined to Rs.15.62 crore from Rs. 21.32 crore. One hypothesis consistent
with these facts, is that it was easier to raise funds for new goods and services, than for the existing
menu of products produced by older companies.
- The declining trend in issues and funds raised through the primary market is expected to
continue through the rest of 1996-97, since the number of the offer documents received by the SEBI in the
first half of 1996-97 is significantly lower than offer documents received in the first half of 1995-96.
The general downtrend in the secondary market and the stricter eligibility criteria introduced by SEBI
are among the reasons behind this downtrend in the primary market issuance.
- SEBI took several initiatives to further develop secondary markets. The Depositories Act, 1996
was enacted in July, 1996. SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996 were notified. They are
the foundation of an institutional framework for minimising the problems associated with physical handling
of securities. They provide a legal framework to record ownership details in a book-entry form.
Other secondary market reforms were aimed at improving the transparency and integrity of markets and
market infrastructure, and introducing uniform and streamlined market practices. A synoptic view of these
reforms is presented in Box 4.2.
BOX 4.2
Secondary Market Reforms: 1996-97
|
- Custodians of securities existing for a considerable period and engaged in providing services to a number of institutional investors can reach the required minimum net worth of Rs.50 crore in a phased manner over a period of 5 years.
- Custodians required by SEBI to appoint a Compliance Officer who will interact with the SEBI regarding compliance and reporting issues.
- SEBI will have monthly meetings with the Association of Custodial Agencies of India (ACAI) before incorporating any changes that have an impact on settlement of transactions of institutional investors.
- Stock exchanges asked to modify the listing agreement to provide for payment of interest by companies to investors from the 30th day after the closure of a public issue.
- Uniform good-bad delivery norms and procedure for time bound resolution of bad deliveries through Bad Delivery Cells prescribed. Bad Delivery Cell procedure have helped to standardise norms.
- All exchanges to institute the buy-in or auction procedure being followed by the National Stock Exchange.
- In view of the falling percentage of deliveries, exchanges asked to collect 100 per cent daily margins on the notional loss of a broker for every scrip, to restrict gross traded value to 33.33 times the brokers base minimum capital and to impose quarterly margins on the basis of concentration ratios.
- Study group constituted to make recommendations for imparting greater transparency and fairness in bulk or negotiated deals.
- Stock exchanges asked to set up a clearing house or clearing corporation.
- Stock exchanges disallowed from renewing contracts in cash group of shares from one settlement to another.
- A core group for inter-exchange market surveillance set up for coordinating action in case of abnormal volatility.
- The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and other exchanges with screen based trading systems allowed to expand their trading terminals to locations where no stock exchange exists, and to others subject to an understanding with the local stock exchange. The setting up of trade guarantee scheme or clearing corporation, mechanisms for handling investor grievances arising from other centres and adequate monitoring mechanisms will be a prerequisite.
- Several restrictions, including limits on the size of issues proposed to be listed on OTCEI removed, and listing criteria for OTCEI, relaxed. Besides, OTCEI permitted to move to a five day accounting period settlement.
- Both, short and long sales will have to be disclosed to the exchange at the end of each day. They would be regulated through the imposition of margins.
- A stock lending scheme has been introduced. Stock lending has been approved in which short sellers could borrow securities through an intermediary before making such sales. The approved intermediary should have a minimum net worth of Rs.50 crore.
|
Depository
- Reduction of settlement risks and shortening of settlement cycles are the basic requirements
for upgrading the existing trading system into a modern one. Severe infrastructure bottlenecks have
often come in the way of upgrading the Indian clearing and settlement system. These bottlenecks have
become more pronounced with a growing number of investors and consequent increase in trading volumes.
The inability of clearing and settlement infrastructure to keep up with the flow of paper has made it
more difficult for the exchanges to shorten settlement cycles and move to rolling settlement. The
Depositories Act, 1996 allows for dematerialisation (and rematerialisation) of securities in depositories and the
transfer of securities through electronic book entry. This will help in reducing settlement risks and removing
some of the infrastructure bottlenecks. The dematerialised securities will be fungible, meaning thereby that
they will not have any distinctive numbers or specific identification. As the network of depositories expands
and the proportion of securities dematerialised increases, the benefits would percolate to the vast
majority of market participants. This is expected to lead to better investor service and investor protection.
- The Depositories Act vests SEBI with the powers of registration of depositories and
participants, and to approve or amend the bye-laws of a depository. After the notification of the SEBI
(Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996, the National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) has been set
up. The NSDL, sponsored by the IDBI, the UTI and the NSE commenced operation in October, 1996.
13 companies have joined NSDL. Scrips of 5 companies are trading in dematerialised form and the
option for dematerialisation is available for scrips in 11 companies. The Depositories Related Laws
(Amendment) Ordinance, 1997 was promulgated to remove some lacunae in the Depositories Act. This will enable
units of mutual funds and UTI, securities of statutory corporations and public sector bonds, to be dealt
through depositories.
- The depository regulations provide for selection of various categories of market participants
as depository participants. The eligible categories include: public financial institutions, scheduled
commercial banks, SFCs, RBI approved foreign banks in India, certified custodians of securities, clearing
corporations of stock exchanges, registered stock brokers, and NBFCs. The depository regulations stipulate
that agreements should be entered into between the depository and every participant, between
participant and every client as well as among depository, issuer company and the registrar.
Stock Exchanges
- An effective monitoring and surveillance mechanism is an important element contributing to
the efficiency and integrity of stock exchanges. The automation process initiated at the BSE, NSE,
OTCEI and other exchanges has made it possible to put such a monitoring mechanism in place. The reach of
the capital market is also increasing significantly through the same process of automation. SEBI
allowed expansion of the trading terminals of screen based trading systems of stock exchanges to cities
having no stock exchange. Expansion to cities with stock exchanges has also been permitted, subject to
an understanding with the local exchange allowing the installation of outside terminals within its
jurisdiction. The participating exchange would keep its membership open to the brokers of the other local
exchanges. It will ensure an adequate arrangement for resolving investor grievances and for timely settlement
of arbitration cases arising out of trades executed on the extended terminals. The expansion of
Bombay On Line Trading (BOLT) system of the stock exchange, Mumbai to the trading systems of other
exchanges will be subject to general conditions. These include ensuring adequate monitoring and
surveillance mechanism, stipulation of usual margins, capital adequacy, intra-day trading limits fixed for the
broker stock exchange and the introduction of trade guarantees. The expansion of trading networks will lead
to healthy competition between various stock exchanges and increase their efficiency.
- SEBI has directed all stock exchanges to set up clearing houses or clearing corporations and
to provide trade guarantees. This would reduce counterparty risks and enable investors trading
through the exchanges to take advantage of settlement of transactions through a depository. Uniform norms
and procedures for timely resolution of bad deliveries have been prescribed and are soon expected to
become operational with the setting up of Bad Delivery Cells in the exchanges. The National Securities
Clearing Corporation Limited (NSCCL) is entrusted with the task of guaranteeing settlement of trades in the
capital market segment of the NSE. It has made considerable progress in enhancing clearing facilities in
other regions by establishing regional clearing facilities. The setting up of Delhi Regional Clearing House
and other regional clearing facilities of the NSCCL, will enable the regional relocation of the
settlement facilities. This will increase the efficiency of the system and lead to timely settlement of transactions
on the NSE.
- Stock Exchanges have been disallowed from renewing contracts in cash group of shares from
one settlement to another. They have to institute a buy-in or auction procedure on the lines of that
being followed by the National Stock Exchange. A time limit of four months has also been prescribed for
the disposal of arbitration cases by the exchanges. In view of the falling delivery percentages,
exchanges have been asked to collect daily margins on the notional loss of a broker for every scrip.
Quarterly margins have been imposed on the basis of concentration ratios.
- The Dave Committee on Over the Counter Exchange of India (OTCEI) has recommended
relaxation of the maximum size of the issues that may be listed on OTCEI, relaxation in listing criteria and a
shift from a rolling (T+3) settlement to five day account period settlement being followed by other
exchanges. These and most of the other recommendations of the committee for making OTCEI more effective
and viable have been accepted by SEBI and are in the process of implementation.
- The expansion of the NSE trading network, and the trading networks of the Mumbai and other
stock exchanges, the expansion of the clearing facilities of the NSCCL to centres outside Mumbai, the
setting up of clearing corporations or clearing houses by the other exchanges, and the expansion of the
network of depository participants is expected to generate healthy competition between the stock exchanges,
stock brokers and other market participants. This is expected to provide transparent and efficient services
to investors, as well as bring investors in diverse parts of the country within a nation-wide trading
and settlement framework.
Takeover Code
- The SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Take-overs) Regulations, 1994 aim at making
the take-over process transparent, and also protect the interests of minority shareholders. The first
competitive bid and the first hostile bid in terms of the regulations were launched in 1995-96. While the
launching of these bids marked the maturing of the process of take-overs, these bids highlighted the need
to strengthen the regulations. SEBI approved the modified takeover code based on the
recommendations of the Bhagwati Committee chaired by former Chief Justice P.N. Bhagwati.
- Under the revised code, a mandatory public offer of 20 per cent purchase will be triggered off
when the threshold limit of 10 per cent equity holding is crossed. This will, however, not apply to
consolidation by those in control, who can purchase 2 per cent of shares per annum as long as their total holding
is below 51 per cent. The pricing of public offers would have to satisfy certain conditions. To
discourage frivolous attempts, acquirers will have to deposit a certain value of cash and assets in an escrow account.
The escrow deposit would be higher for conditional public offers, unless the acquirer agrees to
acquire a minimum 20 per cent even when the full condition is not met. This mandatory acquisition could
be at a lower price to be specified in the conditional offer (Box 4.3).
BOX 4.3
Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers
|
- Definitions of 'acquirer' and 'persons acting in concert' have been amplified to cover direct as well as indirect acquisitions. The definition of "control" would be modified to safeguard shareholders' interest.
- Mandatory public offer is triggered off when the threshold limit of 10 per cent is crossed and there is change in control.
- For the purpose of consolidation of holdings, acquirers holding not less than 10 per cent but not more than 51 per cent are allowed 'creeping acquisition' upto 2 per cent in any period of 12 months. Any purchase for a holding more than 51 per cent will have to be in a transparent manner, through a public tender offer.
- An acquirer, including persons presently in control of the company, should make a public offer to acquire a minimum of 20 per cent in case the conditions for mandatory public offer mentioned earlier are valid.
- SEBI would not be involved in the pricing of offer. Pricing will be based on the parameters such as the negotiated price, average of the high and low price for 26 weeks period before the date of the public announcement, highest price paid by the acquirer for any acquisition during the 26 weeks period before the date of the public announcement, and the price for preferential offers, if any. Use of discretion by SEBI will be reduced to the bare minimum.
- The concept of 'Chain Principle' has been introduced requiring a public offer to be made to shareholders of each company when several companies are acquired through acquisition of one company.
- Disclosure requirement has been strengthened, requiring disclosure of additional details on financial arrangements for implementing the offer, future plans of the acquirer for the target company etc. Disclosure of misleading information will be deemed a violation attracting penal action. Non-exercise of due diligence will also attract penalties.
- Conditional offer has been allowed subject to either a minimum mandatory acceptance of 20 per cent with differential pricing; or, with a deposit of 50 per cent of the value of the offer in cash in the escrow, in cases where the bidder does not want to be saddled with the 20 per cent acquisition.
- The obligations of the board of the target company have also been spelt out. During the offer period, the board is precluded from inducting any person belonging to the acquirer or transfer shares in his name until all the formalities relating to the offer are complete.
|
Surveillance and Enforcement
- Strong and effective enforcement against violations by intermediaries is vital for ensuring
the integrity of markets. Pursuant to this objective, SEBI introduced a number of enforcement
measures during 1996-97. The stock exchanges were asked to implement uniform norms for imposition of
circuit breakers and trading suspensions in cases where price manipulation is suspected. Special and
penal margins have also been introduced. All the exchanges have set up surveillance departments, and
have begun to co-ordinate with SEBI. Daily settlement and pre-issue monitoring reports have been
prescribed by SEBI, for submission by the exchanges. A trading database has been created within SEBI for
trades on the National and Mumbai stock exchanges and is being expanded to include other stock
exchanges. Where price manipulation has been detected, auction proceeds have been frozen and, in several
cases, impounded so that they do not accrue to manipulators.
- SEBI now inspects each exchange and mutual fund at least once every year. It is in the
process of increasing the coverage of inspection of other intermediaries such as stock brokers and
merchant bankers. Intermediaries are also inspected in the process of investigation. On the basis of these
inspections, action has been taken against a wide variety of violations, and penalties ranging from monetary fines
to suspension of their registration for different periods have been imposed. SEBI has also launched
prosecutions against issuers for various violations.
- The bear phase in the secondary markets which had started during 1994-95 continued to
persist during much of 1996-97 (Figure 4.1, Table 4.2)
. Prices in the secondary market reached a peak in
mid-September, 1994 when the sensitive index (Sensex) of the stock exchange, Mumbai closed at
4630.54. There was a clear down-trend in the Sensex from October 1994 to April 1995, with a month-end
closing price index of 3133.28. Since then, the sensex has been characterised by several ups and downs.
The gradually rising trend in May to October 1995 was reversed by a decline in sensex till January 1996.
This was followed by a rising trend till mid-June 1996, and a falling trend till the beginning of December
1996. There has been a substantial recovery since then, and the Sensex closed at 3502 on February 11,
1997. This recent trend in equity prices may be partly attributed to the overall monetary conditions,
especially as reflected in the real rates of interest that are available to potential equity investors in the
corporate bond markets, and in fixed deposits offered by banks and NBFCs.
Long term perspective
- It is seen that in the period from August 1994 to December 1996, price-earnings (P/E) ratios
have fallen more steeply than prices. For example, in December 1996, the monthly closing level of the
sensex was 3085.20 and the monthly average sensex P/E ratio was 12.20, while the monthly average sensex
P/E ratio for November 1993 (sensex closing level 3233.14) was 34.44, and the monthly average
sensex P/E ratio for October 1993 (sensex closing level 3294.42) was 38.76. The monthly sensex P/E ratio
in November 1996 was at its lowest level since April 1989.
- Since April 1986 equity prices have seen two extended periods of declining prices and two
periods of rising prices. From April 1986 to March 1988, the sensex fell from 598.53 to 398.37, a decline of
200 points or almost 33.44 per cent. Prices also fell between March 1992 (when the monthly closing
level of the sensex was 4285.00) and April 1993 (when the monthly closing level was 2122.30), by 50.47
per cent. Periods in which prices generally rose extended from March 1988 to March 1992, and from
May 1993 to August 1994. The monthly closing level of the sensex rose from 398.37 for March 1988
to 4285.00 for March 1992, an increase of over 9.5 times in the a year time span. This period in
which prices were generally rising may be divided into two sub-periods from March 1988 to June 1990, and
from June 1990 to March 1992. The monthly closing level of the sensex for June 1990 was 850.50
indicating that the sensex had risen by 2.13 times over its March 1988 level. In the sub-period between June
1990 and March 1992, the monthly closing level of the sensex increased by just over four times its June
1990 level. In the second period of extended increases in equity prices between April 1993 and August
1994, the monthly closing level of the sensex increased by 1.16 times.
Market Capitalisation and Turnover
- While equity prices have been declining in 1996-97, the total turnover on the Mumbai and
National Stock Exchanges has been increasing. The combined turnover of the Mumbai and National
Stock Exchanges in 1995-96 was Rs.1,17,341 crore. The combined turnover of the Mumbai and National
Stock Exchanges till December 1996 was Rs.2,83,699 crore, over double the level of 1995-96, and over five
times the combined turnover of Rs.50,093 crore of the Mumbai and National Stock Exchanges in
1995-96 till December 1995. The large expansion in turnover may be attributed primarily to the expansion
of the trading network of the National Stock Exchange. Turnover is further expected to expand with
the expansion of the trading networks of the Mumbai and other stock exchanges. Total market
capitalisation as of December 1996 stood at Rs.4,77,425 crore. This was a marginal decline in the total
market capitalisation as of December 1995, of Rs.4,86,192 crore.
Reforms
- The SEBI (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995 were amended to permit the FIIs
to invest up to 10 per cent in the equity of any company, to invest in unlisted companies, and to invest
in debt securities without any requirement for investment in equity. It was further decided to permit FIIs
to invest in dated Government securities within the frame work of guidelines on FII investment in
debt instruments for 100 per cent debt funds. For purpose of BOP management investment by FIIs
through the 100 per cent debt route will come within the overall level of External Commercial Borrowing. The
list of eligible FIIs was expanded to include endowment funds, university funds, foundations and
charitable trusts/societies with good track record. Proprietary funds will also be permitted to make
investments through FII route subject to the condition that they are regulated by their home regulators or
are registered with their tax authorities.
Developments
- FIIs' net Investment in 1996-97 until end-December 1996 at US $ 2,032.8 million was higher
than in the corresponding period of 1995-96 by almost 100 per cent. In 1996-97, monthly net investment
at US $ 433.6 million in April 1996 was at its highest level since the FIIs began investing. During the
first quarter 1996-97, net FII investments rose by more than 340 per cent. (Table 4.3)
. In the second
quarter it was at approximately the same level as in the second quarter of 1995-96. In the third quarter of
1996-97, net FII investment was 69 per cent higher than in the corresponding quarter of 1995-96.
- Of the 427 FIIs registered, on average 130 have been active in any given month in 1996-97.
Almost 60-65 per cent of purchases and sales have been accounted for by only 25 FIIs. FIIs have been
active in over 600 scrips and they transact business through more than 140 brokers. 60-70 per cent
purchases and sales by the FIIs are through the Mumbai stock exchange, and between 25-40 per cent through
the NSE. In 1996-97 until November, gross FII transactions accounted for only a small fraction (2-3 per
cent) of the gross turnover on the NSE and BSE, but for a larger share of deliveries at the end of
the settlement periods.
Global Depository Receipts
- Foreign investment in Indian securities also takes place through the issue of Global
Depository Receipts (GDRs) and Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs). In 1996-97, till December,
Indian issuers made Euro-Issues of US$1304 million. This was higher than the amount raised through
Euro-Issues in the whole of 1995-96, but much lower than overseas issuance in 1993-94 and 1994-95. In
1995-96 and in 1996-97 upto December, the FII's portfolio investment was larger than the foreign
investment through GDRs and FCCBs, reversing the relative position observed in 1992-93 and 1993-94.
Venture Capital Funds
- The SEBI Act requires SEBI to regulate venture capital activity. This area is of particular
importance to our markets and needs to be nurtured. Hence, the regulations (November 1996) provide for a lot
of flexibility. The regulations allow investments only from "institutional investors" and "high net worth"
individuals who are in a position to assess and evaluate the investment risk in such funds. Regulations allow
venture capital funds to make equity investments, invest in unlisted companies, finance turnaround companies
and permit them to provide loans and other forms of assistance. There is no restriction on the period
within which the funds raised should be utilised. The same could be listed on a stock exchange after a
period of 3 years from the date of initial setting up subject to listing agreements and appropriate
regulations. Venture capital funds may be set up as companies or trusts. The entry of institutional investors and
high net worth individuals through venture capital activities is expected to provide an important source
of institutional funds to fledgling firms.
Reforms
- Reforms in the Government securities market aimed to deepen and broaden the market
and increase its liquidity. There was further progress towards a fully "marked to market" valuation of
government securities. The ratio of investments classified in current category by banks was raised from 40 per
cent to 50 per cent for the year ending 1996-97. The new private sector banks were advised to ``mark
to market'' 100 per cent of their investments. The Delivery vs Payment (DVP) system was extended
to auction treasury bills with effect from February 14, 1996 and to other public debt offices by May
1996. In April 1996 encouragement was provided to schemes of mutual funds dedicated to Government
securities and to create a wider investor base for such securities. The RBI announced, liquidity support to
mutual funds dedicated exclusively to investment in Government securities. This would be either by way
of outright purchases or reverse repos, and be limited to 20 per cent of outstanding investment in
Government securities. RBI issued guidelines to banks in June 1996 for retailing of Government securities with
non-bank clients. These include (a) no repurchase of securities sold to the client before the expiry of 30
days, (b) retailing should be on the basis of on-going market rates/yield curve emerging out of
secondary market transactions, (c) sale should be effected by banks only if they hold the securities in their
portfolio either in the form of physical scrips or in the Subsidiary General Ledger (SGL) Account maintained
with RBI, and (d) on sale, deduction of the corresponding amount by the bank from its investment
account and also from its SLR assets. Besides, banks should put in place adequate internal control checks
and mechanisms, and these transactions should be subjected to concurrent audit. Non-bank clients such
as provident funds, trusts, non-banking financial companies and high net worth individuals will provide a
big push to the development of the retail trading in the debt instruments.
Primary Dealers
- The Discount and Finance House of India Ltd. (DFHI) and the Securities Trading Corporation
of India (STCI) started operating as primary dealers from March 1996. Four more primary dealers,
namely, SBI Gilts limited, PNB Gilts limited, ICICI Securities and Gilt Securities Trading Corporation
have commenced operation on June 1, 1996. They would act as market makers for Government securities.
- To enable them to undertake their operations in an effective manner, RBI announced
certain incentives for them. RBI decided to pay commission on primary purchases (including the
underwriting commitment) of Central Government securities by primary dealers, effective July 10, 1996. The rate
of commission for 91-day treasury bills was fixed at 25 paise per Rs. 100 face value, 50 paise for
364- day treasury bills, and Re. 1 for dated securities. The commission on 91-day treasury bills has
been reduced to 12.50 paise with effect from August 23, 1996.
- All PDs provide two way quotes for Government Securities and bid in the auction of 91-day and
364-day treasury bills, as also in the floatation of new loans. Against their commitment to bid for
Rs.4110 crore of Government dated securities during 1996-97, all PDs together have already bid for
Rs.5125.65 crore till end November, 1996. They had a success ratio of 77.30 per cent, against the required
success ratio of 33.33 per cent. In the case of treasury bills, against a committed amount of Rs. 2570 crore
for the year as a whole, they bid for Rs.17395 crore till end-November, 1996. The success ratio of 48.73
per cent was, however, higher than the required 40 per cent. The rate of interest charged by RBI on
reverse repos in 91-day treasury bills is 11.5 per cent per annum and on Government dated securities is 13
per cent annum.
Central Government Borrowing
- The borrowing programme of the Central Government has been achieved much more
comfortably during 1996-97 than in 1995-96 because of relatively easier liquidity conditions since April 1996. The
net market borrowings under "market loans" has been budgeted at Rs.3,700 crore, and the other medium
and long term borrowings at Rs.21,798 crore for the year 1996-97. The budgeted gross borrowing,
including repayments of Rs.9,796 crore, would amount to Rs.35,294 crore. As of December 24, 1996,
Government of India had completed a gross borrowing programme of Rs.33,252 crore representing 94 per cent of
the total budgeted programme of Rs.35,294 crore for 1996-97. The coverage was only about 70 per cent
for the comparable period in 1995-96. The gross issues through dated securities amounted to
Rs.26,911 crore and through 364-day treasury bills amounted to Rs.6,341 crore (Table 4.4)
.
Dated Securities
- Dated securities, consisting of market loans and other medium and long term borrowings,
aggregating Rs.38,634.24 crore were issued during 1995-96. In view of the high level of net issue of ad hoc treasury
bills, exceeding the limits agreed to for the intra-year, the RBI had to enter the market more
frequently during 1995-96. There were larger primary subscriptions by the RBI. In addition, RBI added to its
stocks by issuing in its favour Central Government dated securities for a value aggregating to Rs.5,500
crore on a private placement basis. The recourse to private placement has been made for the first time
since 1987. The devolvement on the RBI in total primary issues, including conversions, rose from a low of
0.74 per cent in 1994-95, to 32.8 per cent in 1995-96. The devolvement on primary dealers stood at 0.2
per cent. During 1996-97, (upto December 24, 1996), total issues of dated securities amounted to
Rs.26,911.05 crore. The devolvement on the Reserve Bank declined to 13.7 per cent in 1996-97 while that on
primary dealers marginally went up to 1.3 per cent.
- Following various measures undertaken by RBI (Chapter 3), a marked softening in the structure
of interest rate was seen during the first half of 1996-97. The implicit yield at cut-off price declined
sharply for both 91-day and 364-day treasury bills, between April and December 1996.
91-Day Treasury Bills
- The Bank followed a policy of consistently placing Rs.500 crore in weekly auctions of
91-day treasury bills. The RBI subscribed in many auctions during 1996-97 for amounts ranging from
Rs.25.92 crore to Rs.388.80 crore. Reserve Bank's holding amounted to as much as Rs. 1,663.85 crore
on December 28, 1996 against the total outstanding of Rs.6,500 crore. At the end of 1995-96, it had
stood at Rs.3,211.47 crore. There has, however, been an increased response from non-competitive
bidders, particularly state governments. During 1995-96, a sum of Rs.11,956.13 crore, comprising 49.82 per
cent of the total issue amount was raised from non-competitive bidders. During 1996-97 (upto December
28, 1996), about Rs.5,288.98 crore (27.84 per cent of total issue) was raised from non-competitive bidders.
The implicit yield at cut-off prices ranged between 11.40 per cent and 12.97 per cent in 1995-96.
During 1996-97 (upto December 28, 1996), the implicit yield ranged between 6.92 per cent and 12.97 per cent.
- During the first auction in early April 1996, the cut-off yield stood at a high of 12.97 per cent.
Since then, the cut-off yields have been treading downward. It had declined to 12.41 per cent by early May.
The declining trend continued till July and cut-off yields reached a low of 8.46 per cent in August.
The downtrend was interrupted thereafter, as cut-off yields rose to 10.17 per cent by early October 1996.
The yields declined significantly to reach a low of 6.92 per cent in early November. By end-December it
firmed up again to 8.16 per cent (Table 4.5)
.
364-Day Treasury Bills
- A gross amount of Rs.6,340.68 crore has been raised during 1996-97 (upto December 20,
1996) against a meagre Rs.1,875 crore raised during the corresponding period of 1995-96 through
364-day treasury bills. The stock of 364-day treasury bills at Rs.6,657.84 crore as on December 20, 1996
showed an increase by Rs.4,783.10 crore over end-March 1996, as against a decline by Rs.4,632.96 crore
during the corresponding period in 1995-96.
- The number of bids received for 364-day treasury bills varied in the range of 12 to 143 in
1996-97 (up to December 20, 1996) as against 3 to 66 during 1995-96. The implicit yield at cut-off
prices ranged between 10.10 per cent and 13.12 per cent in 1996-97 as compared with 12.08 per cent and
13.16 per cent in 1995-96.
- The rising trend in the cut-off yield on 364 day treasury bills which had continued throughout
1995-96, had plateaued by January 1996. The rate remained stable till April 1996. The downtrend in the
cut-off yields of 364-day treasury bills has been less sharp but more sustained than in 91-day treasury
bills. Cut-off yields fell from 13.12 per cent in April to 12.61 per cent in July. They plateaued out at this
rate for a couple of months, and then resumed their downtrend in October. They had reached 10.33 per
cent by end-December, 1996 (Table 4.6)
.
- LIC, GIC and the provident funds are important potential sources of funds for the long-term
debt market. Some of the controls imposed on these institutions have been gradually eased. As a result,
the proportion of investment going into corporate investment has increased. Further replacement of
controls by prudential regulations will be an important factor in the development of the debt market.
Listing of Debt Instruments
- The earlier restriction that debt instruments of a corporate could be listed only after its equity
had been listed on any exchange was removed. The removal of this restriction will particularly ease the
listing of debt instruments for infrastructure projects.
Life Insurance Corporation
- Investment guidelines regarding the utilisation of funds of LIC were last revised in 1995 (Table
4.7)
. According to these guidelines, fixed proportions of the funds have to be invested in various
instruments. These include Central and State Government securities and loans for socially oriented sectors like
house building (75 per cent) and only 25 per cent can be put in corporate sector investments.
- During 1995-96, LIC invested Rs.6485 crore in Central Government securities, Rs.1139 crore
in State Government securities and Government guaranteed marketable securities and another
Rs.1841 crore on disbursing socially oriented sector loans. Though only Rs. 3406 crore was invested in
corporate investments, this represents a trebling of corporate investment since 1993-94. It also represents a
growth of 29.6 per cent over Rs.2629 crore in 1994-95. The pattern of LIC investment has consequently
been changing.
- During 1996-97 upto November, LIC invested Rs.7182 crore in Central Government Securities.
The share of these securities has therefore, declined from 75.3 per cent in April-November, 1995 to 71.1
per cent in April-November, 1996. The share of public sector, cooperative sector and housing, called
the "social sector", has declined from 5.12 per cent to 4.03 per cent over the same time period.
Investment in the corporate sector increased by 13.3 per cent to Rs.1537 crore (from Rs. 1356 crore). This took
its share from 14.94 per cent in April-November, 1995 to 15.22 per cent in April-November, 1996.
General Insurance Corporation
- Under Section 27(B) of the Insurance Act, 1938, GIC and its subsidiaries are allowed to invest
upto 55 per cent of their funds in the market sector and the remaining 45 per cent has to be invested in
socially oriented sector (Table 4.8)
. During 1995-96, GIC invested Rs.421 crore (19.93 per cent) in
Central Government securities, Rs.248 crore (11.72 per cent) in State Government securities and other
approved securities and bonds/debentures of PSU's, and disbursed Rs.171 crore (8.1 per cent) in socially
oriented sector loans. It invested Rs.827 crore (39.20 per cent) in the corporate sector securities and Rs.
444 crore as parked funds (21.1 per cent).
- During 1996-97 upto September 1996, GIC invested Rs.357 crore (24.04 per cent) in
Central Government securities, Rs.286 crore (19.29 per cent) in State Government securities and other
approved securities and bonds/debentures of PSUs, and disbursed Rs.35 crore (2.37 per cent) in socially
oriented sector loans. Against this, Rs.639 crore (43.01 per cent) were devoted to corporate sector
investments and Rs.167 crore (11.4 per cent ) as parked funds. The proportion of investment going to the
corporate sector has consequently increased from 39.2 per cent in 1995-96 to 43.01 per cent in the first half
of 1996-97.
Employees Provident Fund (EPF)
- The funds are invested as per provisions of EPF scheme, 1952 and the guidelines issued by
the Government from time to time. The current guidelines stipulate 25 per cent investment in
Central Government securities, 20 per cent in special deposit scheme, 40 per cent in bonds/securities of
public sector financial institutions and public sector companies and Certificates of Deposits of the public
sector banks, and the remaining 15 per cent for State Government or Central/State Government
guaranteed securities (Table 4.9)
. A comparison of the guidelines issued by the Government show a clear
trend towards liberalisation of investment in favour of higher yielding avenues. In 1993, a separate category
for bonds and securities of public sector financial institutions was created, in which the organisation
was required to invest 15 per cent of its funds. This proportion was raised to 30 per cent in 1994 and
further to 40 per cent in October 1996. The average yield on this category of financial instruments is about
17 per cent against 12 per cent yield earned on special deposit schemes. In 1995, yet another category
of Central Government securities was created for investment by the EPFO. These securities are
now yielding 13.85 per cent rate of interest.
Mutual Funds
- The SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1993 were revised on the basis of the recommendations
of the Mutual Funds 2000 Report prepared by SEBI. The revision has been carried out with the
objective of improving investor protection, facilitating competition, imparting a greater degree of flexibility
and promoting innovation. The existing asset management companies will be required to increase their
net worth from Rs.5 crore to Rs.10 crore within 1 year from the date of notification of the regulations.
The Asset Management Companies (AMCs) can also have cross trusteeship and cross directorship,
provided, there is no conflict of interest. They are also allowed to do other fund based businesses such as
providing investment management services to offshore funds, other mutual funds, venture capital funds and
insurance companies. The revised regulations for mutual funds, however, retain the present fee structure of
the AMCs of 1.25 per cent of weekly average NAV upto Rs.100 crore, and 1 per cent of NAV for net
assets in excess of Rs.100 crore.
- The consent of investors will now have to be obtained for bringing about any change in
the "fundamental attributes" of a scheme on the basis of which the unit holders had made initial
investments. The revised regulations also provide for portfolio disclosure, standardisation of accounting policies,
valuation norms for NAV and pricing. The payment of early bird incentive for various schemes has been
allowed provided they are viewed as interest payments for early investment with full disclosures.
- The various mutual fund schemes would be allowed to mention an indicative return for schemes
for fixed income securities. This will be subject to a variety of disclosures, including:
- That the returns be based on the current yields of instruments which may change from time
to time, depending upon the interest rates prevailing in the market, RBI policy and other
relevant factors.
- In case a portfolio of securities is disclosed, it should also be mentioned that such a portfolio
is a purely illustrative example, and the scheme does not assure that it would maintain this portfolio.
- The returns mentioned are only indicative and not assured. The actual returns will be based
on the actual NAV which may go up or down depending on the market conditions.
- In all 31 mutual funds (excluding the Unit Trust of India) were registered with SEBI as of
December 1996, under the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1993. Of these, 10 belong to the public sector
and 21 are in the private sector. 16 private sector mutual funds and 1 public sector mutual fund have
foreign participation in their asset management companies.
- The performance of mutual funds has not been encouraging during 1995-96, a trend which
has continued in 1996-97. Investor confidence in mutual funds, which ideally should be the most
preferred investment vehicle for the lay investor, has been low. The lukewarm response to their schemes seen
in 1995-96, continued in 1996-97. This could be attributed partly to a lack of confidence and partly
to market conditions which have affected the perception of investors. In 1996-97, upto December,
mutual funds had mobilised only Rs.2,167 crore. With this trend in resources mobilised, it is unlikely that
mutual funds would match Rs.6,508 crore mobilised in 1995-96.
Call Money Market
- Reflecting the improvement in the liquidity position of the banking system, owing to reduction
in CRR and strong growth in bank deposits, there has been a softening in interest rates during 1996-97.
The inter-bank call money rates ruled in the range of 10.00-11.25 per cent in the first quarter of
1996-97. By July 1996, the rates declined sharply to as low as 0.10 -3.00 per cent. After staying at
such historically low levels for about a fortnight, call rates moved upwards and ruled generally in the
range of 5.00 - 10.00 per cent upto October 18, 1996. Subsequent to the announcement of the monetary
policy for the second half of 1996-97, there was a further easing in the call rates which ruled in the range
of 1.00 - 3.00 per cent in the end-October/early-November 1996. Call rates firmed up some what
and declined thereafter towards the end of December 1996 (Fig. 4.2).
Other Short Term Markets
- Interest rates on Certificates of Deposits (CDs) and on Commercial Paper (CP) also exhibited
a declining trend since the beginning of 1996-97. Rates on 3-month CDs fell from 17-19 per cent in
April 1996 to 13 per cent in August 1996. Rates on CPs fell from 18-20 per cent in April to 13-14.24 per
cent in September 1996. Typical interest rates on CDs declined further to the level of 11-12 per cent in
the month of November 1996. Similarly, typical effective rates of discount offered on CP issues
declined steadily to a range of 11.76 per cent to 12.50 per cent per annum in the first fortnight of December 1996.
Repo Operations
- Repos have been resumed on a modest scale in November 1996. They were intensified and
made a regular feature in January and February 1997, with a monthly advance calendar of continuous
repos of 3 to 4 days duration. The aggregate amounts of repo operations (liquidity siphoned off) in January
and February (upto February 7) was Rs. 19,997.19 crore, at cut-off repo rates ranging from 4.90 to 5.25
per cent. These operations were aimed at mopping up excess liquidity, reducing volatility in call
money markets and consequent pressure on foreign exchange markets. The net sale of Government
Securities by the RBI in the secondary market amounted to Rs. 6901.996 crore between April and February 6, 1997.
- The financial sector has a vital role in promoting efficiency and growth. It intermediates the flow
of funds from those who want to save a part of their income to those who want to invest in productive
assets. The efficiency of intermediation depends on the width, depth and diversity of the financial system.
Till about two decades ago, a large part of household savings was either invested directly in physical
assets, or put in bank deposits and Government small saving schemes. It is only since the late eighties that
the equity market has started to play a role in this intermediation process. Other markets, such as
the medium to long term debt markets and short-term money markets, remain relatively segmented
and underdeveloped. In recent decades, the Government and its subsidiary institutions and agencies,
have had an overwhelming and all encompassing role. This has played a part in slowing the evolution
and development of these markets. The extensive system of controls, rules, regulations and
procedures, directly or indirectly affects the development of these markets. We need to clear this web in the
interest of both savers and those who invest in productive assets. Tax deductions and exemptions cannot be
a substitute for reforms of policy and procedures. They can, however, create further distortions.
- The two most serious problems in the financial system are the lack of flexibility in
intermediary behaviour and the segmentation of various markets and sets of financial intermediaries. Well
developed markets are interconnected; demand-supply imbalances in one market overflow into related
markets thereby dampening shocks and disturbances. This inter-connection also ensures that interest rates
and returns in any market, reflect the broad demand-supply conditions in the overall market for savings.
A rise in the demand for funds for investment, above the existing flow of funds from savings, leads to
a rise in the interest rate or rate of return in all markets. The time lag may differ from market to
market depending on economic factors. Conversely, a decline in demand for funds for investment below
saving, leads to a fall in interest rates across the board. This does not happen in segmented markets.
Adjustment in interest rates is also delayed by the slow speed of response of intermediaries and their lack of
flexibility. Because of the historical role of the government and its subsidiary organisations in controlling
and directing all financial activity, the autonomy and flexibility if intermediaries was greatly
circumscribed. Consequently, adjustment to demand-supply imbalance in each segment was also very slow. Over the
last five years a series of reforms. The widening and acceleration of reforms will increase the flexibility
and responsiveness of the intermediaries and promote integration.
